All topics

Preparing for sale

Preparing a business for sale: what buyers check and what takes years to fix

Preparing for a sale means getting the business, its paperwork and yourself ready to be examined before a buyer looks. Buyers pay for what they can verify and mark down what they cannot, and what they verify is mostly the last two to three years of results. The years you spend preparing are the years a buyer will be measuring, which is why the exit-readiness checklist is written for owners one to three years out.

Most of the work centers on the earnings number. Accrual-basis books closed every month make the figures checkable, and a running log of add-backs, kept as the expenses occur, helps legitimate adjustments survive diligence. A sell-side quality of earnings report tests the books and the add-backs before a buyer does, and what it costs follows scope and hours rather than a fixed schedule. What buyers then pay for those earnings varies with company size and with how much of the revenue recurs.

The rest is risk that buyers turn into a lower multiple, an earnout or a bigger escrow. Customer concentration and owner dependence take the longest to fix, because the change has to show up in the results a buyer reviews. Contract clauses, employment practices, IT security, environmental history and intellectual property each draw their own scrutiny, and a data room built early keeps the answers in one place.

Two questions sit outside the paperwork. When to sell turns on business momentum, buyer demand and your own energy, and personal readiness covers what changes for you at closing.

Every article on this topic

Frequently asked questions

How early should an owner start preparing a business for sale?
Advisory firms commonly point to one to three years before a transaction. Customer concentration and a second layer of management need multiple years to show up in the trailing results buyers price, while financial cleanup, contract fixes and document assembly can fit into the last twelve months.
What do buyers mark down in diligence?
Customer concentration is described as the most common structural discount in lower-middle-market deals, and it can shrink the buyer pool as well as the price. Owner dependence is usually repriced rather than refused, through a lower multiple, an earnout or a longer stay for the owner. Earnings a buyer cannot verify get marked down too, which is why add-backs need documents behind them.
Do I need audited financials or a quality of earnings report to sell?
An audit is often not required. Plenty of lower-middle-market deals close on carefully kept internal statements that a quality of earnings report then tests, though institutional buyers and their lenders can ask for more. A quality of earnings report is not legally required either, but a sell-side one finds problems while there is still time to fix them, and its cost follows scope and complexity, not a fixed schedule.