Many owners of lower-middle-market companies also own the building the business operates from, often held in a separate entity that charges the company rent. When the operating business goes to market, that owned real estate becomes its own decision. The property can be kept and leased to the buyer, sold together with the business, or placed in a sale-leaseback with a third-party investor. Each path moves value differently, and each one gets scrutinized in diligence.
Three ways owner-held real estate gets handled
Real estate tied to a business sale generally follows one of three routes. The label matters less than understanding what each one does to price, ongoing cash flow, and future flexibility.
- Keep and lease: the seller retains ownership of the property and signs a lease with the buyer, becoming a landlord and collecting rent after the deal closes.
- Sell with the business: the property transfers to the buyer alongside the operating company, folded into one transaction.
- Sale-leaseback: the property is sold to a real estate investor before or alongside the deal, and the operating business stays in place as a tenant under a long-term lease.
These paths are not mutually exclusive across a portfolio, and the structure often depends on whether the buyer wants to own bricks and mortar at all.
Real estate is usually valued separately from the operating business
Operating companies are commonly priced as a multiple of EBITDA, while commercial real estate is priced off net operating income (NOI) divided by a capitalization rate, or cap rate. Blending the two into a single number tends to misprice at least one of them. Because of that, buyers and advisors typically carve the property out and value it on its own terms.
The cap rate is roughly the inverse of a valuation multiple. An 8% cap rate implies a multiple of about 12.5 times rent, while a 6.5% cap rate implies closer to 15 times. According to SLB Capital Advisors, standard sale-leaseback cap rates in recent markets have fallen in a range of roughly 6.5% to 8.5% for solid credits, implying property multiples of about 12 to 16 times rent.
This is where a value gap can appear. Many middle-market operating businesses trade at mid to high single-digit EBITDA multiples, while quality real estate can command double-digit multiples of its rent. When the real estate multiple sits above the business multiple, separating the two can surface value that a blended price would bury. SLB Capital Advisors frames this arbitrage as one of the most compelling and most frequently overlooked reasons to treat the property as its own asset.
The size of the property relative to the business also shapes the decision. A modest owner-occupied building attached to a larger operating company is a smaller variable, while a business whose real estate is worth as much as or more than its operations effectively involves two transactions running in parallel. The credit quality of the tenant matters too, because an investor pricing a lease is really pricing the reliability of the rent payments over the life of the lease.
Keep the property and lease it to the buyer
Retaining the building and leasing it to the buyer lets the seller keep an income-producing asset and step into the role of landlord. The lease terms then become part of the negotiation. A market-rate lease with a defined term, renewal options, and a triple-net structure, under which the tenant covers property taxes, insurance, and maintenance, is a common template.
The tradeoffs are real on both sides. Retained ownership keeps future appreciation and rental income with the seller, but it also keeps property management responsibilities and concentration risk in a single tenant. Buyers weigh whether they want a landlord relationship with the former owner and whether the rent is set at a defensible market level.
Sell the property with the business
Bundling the property into the same transaction can simplify the deal for a buyer who wants to control its own premises, and it gives the seller a clean exit from both the business and the building at once. The risk is pricing. If the real estate is absorbed into the EBITDA multiple rather than valued on a cap rate, a low prevailing cap rate can mean the property is effectively sold at the lower business multiple, leaving value on the table.
Sellers who bundle generally still benefit from an independent appraisal of the real estate so the two assets can be priced on their own merits inside one purchase agreement. Bundling can also change the tax picture, since the gain on appreciated real property and the gain on the business may be treated differently, another reason the property is often analyzed on its own before a structure is settled.
Why buyers often prefer to lease at market rent
Many acquirers, especially financial buyers, are buying an operating business rather than a real estate portfolio. Owning property ties up capital and demands management attention that specialized operators may not want. Leasing at a market rent lets a buyer pay for the operating company at its business multiple and treat occupancy as a predictable operating cost.
A sale-leaseback to a third-party investor serves the same preference from a different angle. The property is sold to an investor who wants stable, long-dated income, and the business continues as a tenant. SLB Capital Advisors notes that these leases commonly run 15 to 20 years of base term with renewal options, structured as absolute net leases so the tenant carries taxes, insurance, and upkeep. Whether the seller keeps the property or a new investor holds it, the buyer of the business ends up with the same outcome, a lease at market terms rather than a building on its balance sheet.
Related-party rent gets normalized in diligence
When a business rents from an entity the same owner controls, the rent charged is often set for tax or estate reasons rather than at arm's length. Quality of earnings analysis treats that rent as a normalization item. If the business pays below-market rent, reported EBITDA is inflated and a buyer will adjust it down to reflect what a third party would actually pay. If the rent runs above market, it can be added back to raise normalized EBITDA.
The practical points buyers and their accountants tend to examine include the following.
- Market comparison: the related-party rent is benchmarked against comparable arm's-length leases for similar space.
- Direction of the adjustment: normalization can move EBITDA up or down, and both cases affect the price a buyer is willing to pay.
- Post-close terms: the rent in any go-forward lease is expected to line up with the normalized market figure used in the valuation.
Because normalized EBITDA drives the purchase price, a related-party rent that is far from market is one of the items most likely to be challenged during a quality of earnings review.
Tax considerations at a high level
This article is educational and is not tax, legal, or investment advice. Real estate carries its own tax profile separate from the operating business, and the sale of appreciated property can trigger a taxable gain. One mechanism that exists in this area is the Internal Revenue Code section 1031 like-kind exchange. For tax years beginning in 2018 and later, section 1031 treatment applies only to exchanges of real property held for use in a trade or business or for investment, following changes made by the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act. Deferred exchanges also carry strict timing rules, including a 45-day window to identify replacement property and a 180-day window to receive it.
Whether any of this applies to a given situation depends on facts, entity structure, and timing that vary widely from one owner to the next. Those questions belong with a qualified tax advisor and attorney rather than a general article.
How real estate fits a prepared sale process
Deciding how to handle the property early tends to reduce surprises later. Separating the real estate question from the business valuation, obtaining an independent property appraisal, and documenting a market-rate lease all make the numbers easier to defend when a buyer and its accountants dig in. Platforms such as Bankerly organize this alongside the broader deliverables of a sell-side process, including the quality of earnings work where related-party rent normalization surfaces. The aim is a clean picture in which the business is priced on its earnings and the real estate is priced on its own terms.
Sources
Frequently asked questions
- Is the real estate valued separately from the business itself?
- Typically yes. Operating businesses are usually priced as a multiple of EBITDA, while commercial property is priced off net operating income divided by a cap rate. Blending the two into one number tends to misprice at least one asset, so buyers and advisors commonly value the property on its own.
- How does a cap rate relate to an EBITDA multiple?
- A cap rate is roughly the inverse of a valuation multiple. An 8% cap rate implies about a 12.5 times multiple of rent, and a 6.5% cap rate implies closer to 15 times. When real estate multiples exceed the business EBITDA multiple, separating the two can surface value that a blended price would hide.
- Why do buyers often prefer to lease rather than own the property?
- Many acquirers, especially financial buyers, want the operating business rather than a real estate portfolio. Owning property ties up capital and adds management responsibilities. Leasing at a market rent lets a buyer pay the business multiple for the company and treat occupancy as a predictable operating cost.
- What is related-party rent normalization in diligence?
- When a business rents from an entity its owner controls, the rent is often not set at arm's length. Quality of earnings analysis adjusts it to market. Below-market rent inflates reported EBITDA and gets adjusted down, while above-market rent can be added back, and either change affects the price a buyer will pay.
- Can a 1031 exchange defer tax on the sale of the real estate?
- A section 1031 like-kind exchange exists for real property held for business or investment use, with strict deadlines including 45 days to identify replacement property and 180 days to receive it. Whether it applies to a specific situation depends on facts and structure, which is a question for a qualified tax advisor. This is educational information, not tax advice.
Considering a sale in the next few years? See what a prepared process looks like.
Keep reading